Farra is a death administration assistant for UK families. Get step-by-step guidance for registering a death, applying for probate, notifying banks, and managing bereavement admin. From essential documents to practical checklists, Farra simplifies estate paperwork and funeral-related tasks so you can focus on what matters.
This guide has not been checked against its sources
We re-checked our most-read guides against GOV.UK and the other official sources in September 2026. This one was not among them, so nobody has confirmed its figures, deadlines or process steps since it was written. Treat it as a starting point and confirm anything that matters on GOV.UK before you act on it.
When a disabled or vulnerable person inherits under the intestacy rules, the outcome is often harmful rather than helpful. The intestacy rules treat everyone equally — they cannot be sensitive to one beneficiary's need for protection from the benefits system, or their inability to manage a large sum of money. A sudden inheritance can strip away carefully maintained benefits eligibility overnight. The intestacy rules have no mechanism to hold a share in trust; only a will can do that.
Many disabled people rely on means-tested benefits to fund their daily living, housing, and care. These include:
So an inheritance above £16,000 ends entitlement to Universal Credit and, for most people, Housing Benefit. Between £6,000 and £16,000 it reduces rather than ends the payment. Pension Credit and the care-funding rules work differently, so the effect of an inheritance depends on which benefits the person actually receives.
The perverse outcome: a disabled person who might have benefited from a modest inheritance could instead find themselves worse off — losing more in benefits than they gained in inheritance, until they have spent down the inherited capital.
Note that non-means-tested benefits (Disability Living Allowance, Personal Independence Payment, Attendance Allowance) are not affected by capital.
The intestacy rules under the Administration of Estates Act 1925 give no special treatment to disabled beneficiaries. A disabled child inherits an equal share alongside their siblings, in the same way as any other child. A disabled spouse inherits what any surviving spouse would inherit. There is no mechanism in the intestacy rules to hold the inheritance in trust or release it in a way that protects benefits eligibility.
For the full intestacy overview, see our main intestacy guide.
A beneficiary can disclaim (refuse) an inheritance. If a disabled person disclaims their share, it passes under the intestacy rules to the next eligible person — it does not stay in trust for the disabled person. The disclaimed share cannot be directed to a trust for the disabled person.
A disclaimer is irrevocable. It is a nuclear option — the disabled person simply gives up their share. This may be rational if the inheritance would cost them more in lost benefits than it provides in value, but it is a poor substitute for proper planning.
Note: DWP can treat a disclaimer as a deliberate deprivation of capital, in which case the person is assessed as if they still had the money — the notional capital rule. A disclaimer made in order to keep benefits is exactly what that rule is aimed at.
If the disabled person has mental capacity, they have the same rights as any other beneficiary to apply for letters of administration (if they are at the top of the priority order). If they lack mental capacity, their deputy (appointed by the Court of Protection) may be able to act on their behalf.
The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 gives courts the power to order additional financial provision for a person where the intestacy rules (or a will) fail to make reasonable provision. For a disabled child or dependant, the court has particular regard to their financial needs and physical or mental disability.
The court is not limited to ordering a lump sum. Section 2(1) lets it order periodical payments, a lump sum, a transfer of property, or — at paragraph (d) — “the settlement for the benefit of the applicant” of property from the estate, with section 2(4) allowing it to confer the necessary powers on the trustees. So the court can put provision into a trust rather than paying capital directly to a disabled applicant.
A claim is still contested litigation with an uncertain outcome, and it must normally be brought within six months of the grant.
Where a will is made, one option is a discretionary trust. It is worth keeping three different things apart, because they are often run together and they do different jobs. A discretionary trust is the structure that keeps the money out of the means test, because no beneficiary has a right to any of it. A vulnerable beneficiary trust is a tax concept — a trust that qualifies for special treatment under the Finance Act 2005 and section 89 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984. A protective property trust is something else again: a life interest in a share of a home, normally used between spouses. The features that matter for benefits are these:
HMRC operates a separate tax regime for “vulnerable beneficiary trusts”, which can give favourable inheritance tax and income tax treatment where the qualifying conditions are met. The tax treatment and the benefits treatment are decided by different rules, and a trust can satisfy one without satisfying the other.
The intestacy rules contain no trust mechanism of this kind. They give a disabled beneficiary their share outright, as capital, in their own name. A will is the only document that can direct a share into a trust instead.
Other family members should also consider whether their own wills protect the disabled person — a grandparent's will, for instance, can leave a legacy to a discretionary trust rather than directly to a disabled grandchild.
See our probate checklist.
Sources
Related guides