Farra is a death administration assistant for UK families. Get step-by-step guidance for registering a death, applying for probate, notifying banks, and managing bereavement admin. From essential documents to practical checklists, Farra simplifies estate paperwork and funeral-related tasks so you can focus on what matters.
Need to apply for probate?
Answer 15 questions and we'll tell you exactly what to file, in what order — from £95.
Apply to the Attorney General for a new inquest (requires new evidence, no strict deadline), seek judicial review through the High Court within 3 months (for procedural errors), or complain to the Chief Coroner. Success rates are low, costs range from £10,000-£50,000+, and specialist legal advice is essential.
If you believe a coroner has made an incorrect decision, reached the wrong conclusion, or conducted an inquest unfairly, you have legal options to challenge. However, challenges are difficult, expensive, and rarely successful. Understanding the grounds for challenge and the processes involved is essential before proceeding.
Important: This is a complex area of law. You'll almost certainly need specialist legal advice before pursuing any formal challenge. This guide provides an overview but shouldn't substitute for professional legal counsel.
October 2026 Update:
Recent case law has clarified the grounds for challenging coroner conclusions, making it slightly easier to seek new inquests when significant new evidence emerges. However, challenges remain difficult.
When: After an inquest has concluded with a conclusion you believe is wrong or insufficient.
Process: Apply to the Attorney General or Solicitor General (for England and Wales) to request the High Court order a new inquest.
Deadline: No strict deadline, but must be made within a reasonable time (usually within months, not years).
When: To challenge the coroner's decision-making process or procedural decisions before or during an inquest.
Process: Apply to the High Court for judicial review of the coroner's decision.
Deadline: Must apply promptly, and in any event within 3 months of the decision being challenged.
When: For concerns about how the investigation was conducted, delays, or coroner behavior.
Process: Write to the Chief Coroner outlining your concerns.
Outcome: Can result in guidance to the coroner, but won't overturn conclusions or order new inquest.
When: For serious complaints about the coroner's personal conduct.
Process: Submit formal complaint to JCIO.
Outcome: Can result in disciplinary action against the coroner, but doesn't change the inquest outcome.
The most common way to challenge an inquest conclusion:
You must show one or more of the following:
Applications for new inquests are rarely successful. The Attorney General receives around 50-100 applications annually and agrees to only about 5-10. The High Court then grants even fewer. You need very strong grounds.
The process typically takes 6-18 months from application to decision, and if a new inquest is ordered, that adds another 12-24 months.
Expensive. Typical costs:
Judicial review challenges the decision-making process, not the conclusion itself:
You must show the coroner's decision was:
Judicial review must be brought "promptly" and in any event within 3 months of the decision. Delay can be fatal to your case even if you have good grounds.
Judicial review carries significant costs risks:
For less serious concerns, the complaints process may be more appropriate:
When to use:
Process:
Outcome: Chief Coroner can provide guidance to coroners but cannot overturn decisions or order new inquests.
When to use:
Process:
Outcome: Can result in advice, warning, or in serious cases, removal from office. Doesn't change inquest outcome.
Before formal complaints, consider raising concerns directly with the coroner or senior coroner. Many issues can be resolved through direct communication.
Important factors to consider before pursuing a challenge:
Consult with a specialist inquest solicitor who can objectively assess your prospects. Organizations like INQUEST can help you find appropriate legal advice and may be able to assess whether you have grounds for challenge.
Sometimes alternative approaches achieve better results than challenging the inquest:
If your goal is compensation for negligence or wrongdoing, civil litigation may be more effective than challenging the inquest. Civil courts aren't bound by inquest conclusions.
If you believe a crime was committed, report to police or CPS. They make independent decisions about prosecution regardless of inquest conclusions.
Complain to professional bodies (GMC, NMC, etc.) about professional conduct. They investigate independently of inquests.
Report workplace safety concerns to HSE. They can prosecute employers regardless of inquest conclusions.
If your goal is systemic change, public campaigning may be more effective than legal challenges. Prevention of Future Deaths reports already highlight systemic issues.
Situation: Inquest concluded natural causes. Expert review commissioned by family found clear evidence of medical negligence not considered at inquest.
Outcome: Attorney General agreed to apply for new inquest. High Court ordered fresh inquest with broader scope.
Why it succeeded: Significant new expert evidence that was credible and directly contradicted original findings.
Situation: Coroner narrowly scoped inquiry, excluding examination of systemic failures in mental health trust.
Outcome: Judicial review granted. Court found coroner should have examined wider systemic issues given Article 2 obligations.
Why it succeeded: Clear legal error in scope determination with significant human rights implications.
Situation: Coroner refused to allow family to question key witnesses, significantly limiting their participation.
Outcome: Judicial review succeeded. Court found breach of Article 2 procedural obligations.
Why it succeeded: Fundamental procedural unfairness preventing effective investigation.
If you've decided to pursue a challenge:
Most challenges are unsuccessful. If your challenge fails:
Accept the outcome: Courts very rarely allow appeals of challenges. Further legal action is usually futile.
Pursue alternatives: Consider civil litigation, professional complaints, or campaigning instead.
Seek closure: At some point, continuing to fight prevents healing. Bereavement counseling can help.
Channel energy positively: Some families find meaning in campaigning for systemic change rather than focusing on their specific case.
Before embarking on a challenge, understand these realities:
Challenges to Fatal Accident Inquiry determinations are made through the Scottish courts. The process is similar but governed by Scots law. Consult a Scottish solicitor experienced in FAIs.
Northern Ireland has similar challenge mechanisms to England and Wales, with Attorney General for Northern Ireland handling applications for fresh inquests.
Legal rights as an interested person, accessing reports, legal representation, and how to raise concerns during the investigation.
How to challenge or appeal a coroner's inquest verdict in the UK. Judicial review, the Chief Coroner, grounds for challenge, and timescales and costs.
Which deaths are referred to the coroner, what happens during an investigation, and how long the process takes.
Types of post-mortems, when they're required, what happens during the procedure, religious considerations, and timeline implications.
Complete guide to coroner's inquests, who attends, the hearing process, giving evidence, and possible outcomes.
Ready to apply for probate?
Answer 15 questions and we'll tell you exactly what to file, in what order, and what to do when it gets complicated.
Get started →Free to start · from £95